Criterion VI – Governance, Leadership and Management
Metric No. |
Key Indicator - 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership |
Download |
6.1.1 |
The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with
the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various
institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained
institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the
institutional governance and in their short term and long term
Institutional Perspective Plan.
|
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator - 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment |
Download |
6.2.1 |
The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and
functioning of the institutional bodies are effective and efficient as
visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service
rules, and procedures, etc.
|
|
6.2.2 |
Institution implements e-governance in its operations.
6.2.2.1 e-governance is implemented covering the following areas of
operations:
- Administration including complaint management
- Finance and Accounts
- Student Admission and Support
- Examinations
|
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator - 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (30) |
Download |
6.3.1 |
The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare
measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for
career development/progression.
|
|
6.3.2 |
Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend
conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional
bodies during the last five years.
6.3.2.1: Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend
conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional
bodies year-wise during the last five years.
|
|
6.3.3 |
Percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty
Development Programmes (FDPs)/ Management Development Programmes (MDPs) during the last five years.
6.3.3.1: Total number of teachers who have undergone online/ face
to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)/ Management
Development Programs (MDP) during the last five years.
|
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization |
Download |
6.4.1 |
Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds other than salary
and fees and the optimal utilisation of resources.
|
|
6.4.2 |
Funds / Grants received from government bodies, non-government
bodies, and philanthropists during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III and V).
6.4.2.1: Total Grants received from government/non-government
bodies,philanthropists year wise during last five years (not covered in
Criterion III and V) (INR in Lakhs).
|
|
6.4.3 |
Institution regularly conducts internal and external financial audits
regularly.
|
|
Metric No. |
Key Indicator - 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System |
Download |
6.5.1 |
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)/ Internal Quality Assurance
System (IQAS) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the
quality assurance strategies and processes, by constantly reviewing
the teaching-learning process, structures & methodologies of
operations and learning outcomes, at periodic intervals.
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed
significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies
and processes visible in terms of –
Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with
regard to quality (in case of first cycle)
Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with
regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives (second
and subsequent cycles)
|
|
6.5.2 |
The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures &
methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms.
|
|
6.5.3 |
Institution has adopted the following for Quality assurance:
- Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow up action taken
- Conferences, Seminars, Workshops on quality conducted
- Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)
- Orientation programme on quality issues for teachers and students
- Participation in NIRF and other recognized ranking like Shanghai
Ranking, QS Ranking Times Ranking etc
- Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international
agencies
|
|